What the Drought Actually Cost
A planned £37,000 profit, turned into a £5,000 loss by a dry spring. The arithmetic, in full.
- Subject
- The numbers
- Published
- 2026-02-18
The 2024–25 farming year was planned to make about thirty-seven thousand pounds. It lost roughly five thousand. The entire difference was weather.
Wheat came in about thirty per cent down. Barley about forty per cent down. Durum wheat, which was expected at six tonnes a hectare, came in under two in places. On Cotswold brash — fifteen to forty-five centimetres of stony soil over limestone — there is almost no water-holding capacity, so when it stops raining in April the crop simply stops.
The year before, it did not stop raining, and the farm made under fifteen thousand pounds. Too wet, then too dry. That is not bad luck. That is arable farming, and it is precisely why agri-environment scheme income — which arrives regardless of rainfall and now accounts for around thirty per cent of average English farm business income — matters more than any agronomic decision made all year.
Subject
The numbers
Published
2026-02-18
Written by
Somebody who was there
Free
No paywall, no account
One email a fortnight.
Everything published here, plus what is happening in the fields.
What people actually ask.
The two questions this page gets most, answered without a support ticket.
It is written for the estate, from the fields rather than from a desk, and it argues rather than announces.
Enthusiastically. Bothering Us goes to a person, not a queue.
Everything on this site is a demonstration build. The pages are real, the words are ours, and the checkout takes no money.
The rules that apply to this.
/lawyering/terms/
/lawyering/privacy/
/lawyering/cookies/
/lawyering/contact/