Eleven votes, four vetoes, and what happened next.
The whole record. A vote that is not published afterwards is a poll, and a veto that is not published afterwards is somebody quietly ignoring you.
Every vote since the first one.
Eleven votes carried, four vetoed, and three of the eleven turned out badly. That ratio is about what you would expect and it is the reason the veto is not used more often.
Recorddeciding-ledger
-
Mar 2024
Vote carriedSpring barley over spring oats in the Barley Block, 61%
Viewers
3f81aa -
Mar 2024
OutcomeYielded 5.9 t/ha, which was about average. A fine decision
Recorded
9d20b4 -
Sep 2024
Vote carriedDrill the wheat in the third week of September, 58%
Viewers
c7e451 -
Sep 2024
VETOBlackgrass burden. Drilled 18 October instead
C. Ireland
a10c39 -
Aug 2025
OutcomeThe delayed field out-yielded the early one by 0.7 t/ha
Recorded
e4b7f2 -
Feb 2025
Vote carriedHerbal ley on the wildflower ground, 71%
Viewers
bb9017 -
Apr 2025
Vote carriedSell the store cattle in July rather than October, 54%
Viewers
2a6ee8 -
Jul 2025
OutcomeSold into a poor July trade. It cost about £3,100 and the vote was wrong
Recorded
d5310c -
Sep 2025
Vote carriedEarly drilling again, 63%
Viewers
77af41 -
Sep 2025
VETOBlackgrass, again, in the same field, for the same reason
C. Ireland
0e92cd -
Nov 2025
Vote carriedA high-yielding feed variety, 49% on a three-way split
Viewers
48d7a0 -
Nov 2025
VETOSeptoria rating unsuitable for this site. Second choice ran
C. Ireland
6c1b83 -
Feb 2026
Vote carriedRoll before stone picking, 55%
Viewers
f09e27 -
Feb 2026
VETOWrong order. Stones first, and the combine thanks you in August
C. Ireland
13ca6f -
Apr 2026
Vote carriedLeave the six worst acres entirely, 68%
Viewers
8b40d5 -
Jun 2026
OutcomeCheapest decision of the year and probably the best one
Recorded
ae7318
Yields, prices and dates are illustrative for this demonstration build. The pattern — the audience votes early and the agronomist stops it — is the part worth keeping.
How the audience actually votes.
| Tendency | Direction | Right? |
|---|---|---|
| Drilling date | Always earlier | No. Wrong four times out of four |
| Variety choice | Highest yield on the list | Sometimes. It ignores disease scores |
| Selling livestock | Earlier than the market suggests | No, on the one occasion it was asked |
| Leaving land unfarmed | Strongly in favour | Yes, and more consistently than we expected |
| Spending money on kit | Strongly in favour | Untested. We have never let it decide one |
| Doing the difficult thing | In favour, at a distance | Which is the whole nature of voting from a sofa |
Why the outcomes are published even when the vote was wrong.
The July cattle sale cost about three thousand one hundred pounds against the October trade. Fifty-four per cent of several thousand people voted for it, we did it, and it was a bad decision.
Publishing that matters more than publishing the good ones. A vote where only the successes appear afterwards is entertainment; a vote where the failures appear with the arithmetic attached is a genuine account of what happens when a large number of interested people make a decision they do not have to live with.
Nobody has ever complained about being told their vote lost money. Several people have said it was the first time they understood why farming decisions are hard.
The record, at a glance.
11 votes carried
Across two and a half years.
4 vetoes
All agronomic, all stated live.
3 that went badly
Published with the arithmetic.
Nothing removed
Including the ones that cost money.
What people ask about the vetoes.
It would if it were used quietly or often. Four times in eleven votes, each one stated live with a reason and published afterwards, means the other seven decisions genuinely were the audience’s.
No, and it should not be. The person holding it is the only one in the conversation with a professional qualification and a reputation attached to the outcome. A veto that can be overruled by the people it exists to overrule is decoration.
Because early drilling looks like getting on with it, and blackgrass is invisible on a camera in September. It is a completely reasonable instinct and it has been wrong every time it has been offered.
No. If a decision changes after the vote — because the weather moved or the seed was unavailable — it goes on this page with the reason, labelled as a change rather than a veto.
What is open now.
Three questions, all of them decisions that have to be made anyway.
Get told before everyone else
One email a fortnight about what is actually happening in the fields, the brewery and the pub — including the bits that went wrong.