Safeguarding.
A community that arranges for strangers to meet each other in village halls and on farms has to be specific about this, and vague about it is worse than silent.
The one that matters most.
Nattering wardens are volunteers and are not DBS-checked. They are members who put their hand up, not vetted staff, and no parish activity should be treated as supervised childcare of any kind.
The rules we actually apply.
Age
- Minimum account age
- 16Verified at sign-up by declaration, as is standard.
- Under 18 at a meet
- With a responsible adultThe adult must be a member and must be present.
- Under 18 on a Neighbouring visit
- Not arranged through usFarms may host families privately; we do not put it on the register.
- Anything alcohol-related
- 18 and cardedTastings, brewery events, the pub. No discretion available.
Contact
- Private messaging
- Off by defaultA member turns it on. Under-18 accounts cannot turn it on.
- Neighbouring requests
- Through the parish pageNever by private message. This is the single most important rule here.
- Sharing an address
- Not on the public registerExchanged directly, once a visit is agreed.
- Photographs at a meet
- With everybody’s agreementThe most common cause of an awkward removal.
Escalation
- Concern about a member
- To an estate moderatorNot to a warden, who is a volunteer and a neighbour.
- Anything involving a child
- Account closed immediatelyNo warning, no appeal window, reported to the relevant authority.
- Threats
- Account closed immediatelyAnd reported where there is anybody to report it to.
- Median response, urgent reports
- Under 1 hourAgainst 4 hours 20 minutes for ordinary reports.
This is a demonstration build and holds no real personal data. The policies described are the ones a platform of this shape would need, written out so they can be argued with.
Why a volunteer model needs saying out loud.
The strength of this community is that it is run by members. Twelve wardens, none of them employed, none of them appointed by us, all of them living in the parish they run. That is why it works and it is why people trust it.
It is also the risk. A volunteer is not vetted, not trained and not insured, and a platform that let people assume otherwise would be storing up something genuinely bad.
So we say it plainly on the page rather than in a clause: your warden is a neighbour, not a member of staff. Treat a parish meet the way you would treat any gathering of people you do not yet know, which is to say cheerfully and with your eyes open.
Your warden is a neighbour, not a member of staff.
If something goes wrong.
Report it, from anywhere.
One tap on a post, or Bothering Us for anything that is not a post. No form, no reason required.
It goes to a moderator, not a warden.
Deliberately. A warden should not have to adjudicate on somebody they will see in a hall next month.
Urgent things are looked at within the hour.
Ordinary reports take a median of four hours and twenty minutes.
You are told what happened.
Every reporter gets the outcome, which is not universal practice and ought to be.
The questions that need a straight answer.
No. They are volunteer members, and no parish activity is supervised childcare. If that changes for a particular activity, that activity will have its own arrangements and they will be stated on the page.
From 16, with private messaging permanently off and no access to anything alcohol-related. Attending a meet requires a responsible adult who is also a member.
It goes to an estate moderator rather than to your warden, it is logged, and you are told the outcome. Appeals are heard by somebody other than the person who decided.
No. This is a demonstration build with no real members and no real data. The policies are written out because a community platform without them is not finished, not because there is a register to protect.
The rules themselves.
Six of them, in English, with twelve months of removal figures published.
Elsewhere on the estate.
/belonging/
/onlyfarmers/herds/
/broadcasting/
